Compare AWS AccessDenied and GCP PERMISSION_DENIED to isolate authorization deny layers, separate auth failures, and apply precise IAM fixes fast.
Last reviewed: February 20, 2026|Editorial standard: source-backed comparison guidance
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/xml
<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>
<RequestId>4442587FB7D0A2F9</RequestId>
<HostId>host-id-redacted</HostId>
</Error>HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json
{
"error": {
"code": 403,
"status": "PERMISSION_DENIED",
"message": "Permission denied on resource."
}
}No. Both indicate authorization denial. In Google semantics, unidentified callers should be UNAUTHENTICATED, not PERMISSION_DENIED.
Another control layer can still block access, such as explicit deny rules, boundaries, org-level controls, or resource policy conditions.
Use provider status semantics first: PERMISSION_DENIED for authorization decisions, RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED for quota/capacity exhaustion, then confirm with policy and quota telemetry.
Compare AWS ThrottlingException and GCP RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED to separate rate limiting from quota/resource exhaustion and choose the remediation path.
Fix 401 Unauthorized vs 403 Forbidden by separating authentication failures from authorization denials, then apply the right login or permission fix fast.